Search alternatives:
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.…”
-
164
SIMPER results for the behaviors that most contributed to the differences observed after pairwise comparison for significant effects obtained in PERMANOVA.
Published 2020“…<p>SIMPER results for the behaviors that most contributed to the differences observed after pairwise comparison for significant effects obtained in PERMANOVA.…”
-
165
Statistically significant differences in gut microbiome relative abundances.
Published 2022Subjects: -
166
Contains R code utilized in the analyses.
Published 2024“…Certain risk factors, such as age and sex differences, are thought to play a significant role in the susceptibility, progression, and response to neurological disease. …”
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
-
177
The combination of LPS and PFC caused faster clot initiation and decreased clot strength.
Published 2022“…By RM ANOVA, the time effects were obscured by interaction with group: SAL-SAL, p = NS; LPS-SAL, MA increases with time; T0 v T72 and T96, p≤0.05; SAL-PFC: MA drops @ T96, p≤0.05; LPS-PFC: T0 v all others, p≤0.05 with a recovery at T96, (p≤0.05 compared to T72); SAL-PFC: no significant change, p = NS. …”
-
178
Heatmaps of significant community cohesion differences between paired groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
179
Heatmaps of significant community disjointedness differences between paired groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
180