Search alternatives:
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
affected release » effective release (Expand Search), affected areas (Expand Search), affected genes (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
affected release » effective release (Expand Search), affected areas (Expand Search), affected genes (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Response of small airway tissues infected with EV-D94 and decreasing doses of EV-D68.
Published 2022“…<p>Tissues were infected with 1E7 RNA copies of EV-D94 (equivalent to 2,46E4 TCID50) and 1E7 RNA copies of EV-D68 (3,3E5 TCID50) as well as decreasing doses of the latter. A and B: Viral loads were quantified by RT-PCR from apical wash samples collected at the indicated time points (A) or from tissues lysed at 2dpi (B). …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Estimated annual variation in predicted skin lesion point prevalence by pod.
Published 2023Subjects: -
13
-
14
In microglia, C1 reduced NO release triggered by IFNγ and PolyIC, and did not affect LPS induced cytokine release.
Published 2023“…The respective DMSO controls (grey bar) did not significantly affect the IL6, TNFα and IL1β release. *** p<0.001 ** p<0.01 comparing to stimulated control; ### p<0.001 ## p<0.01 compared to DMSO (1way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test).…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20