Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
Mean values (± standard deviation) of hormonal parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
110
Mean values (± standard deviation) of electrolyte concentrations before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
116
-
117
-
118
Sound stress exposure prolonged the period of decreased withdrawal threshold after complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injection.
Published 2025“…(B) 50% withdrawal threshold in CFA-treated mice exposed to sound stress. They showed a significant decrease in 50% withdrawal threshold on day 7 after CFA injection, and CFA-treated mice exposed to sound stress showed a significant decrease in 50% withdrawal threshold during days 7–21 after CFA injection (CFA, on day 7, ****<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs day 0, on day 10, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs day0; CFA + stress, day 7, 10, 14, and 21, ****<i>P</i> < 0.0001 vs day 0, Dunnett’s test). …”
-
119
Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
120
Mean values (± standard deviation) of renal profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: