Search alternatives:
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
difference tests » difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search), reference test (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
difference tests » difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search), reference test (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Graph of wear volume variation for test groups with different particle sizes at two concentrations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Kruskal Wallis test for statistically significant differences among PPE items by gender <sup><sup>b'a'</sup>, <sup>b'b'</sup></sup>.
Published 2023“…<p>Kruskal Wallis test for statistically significant differences among PPE items by gender <sup><sup>b'<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0282673#t003fn001" target="_blank">a</a>'</sup>, <sup>b'<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0282673#t003fn002" target="_blank">b</a>'</sup></sup>.…”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Average effect size decreased as sample size increased for all types of analyses (<i>p</i> < .001).
Published 2022Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20
Comparison of the statistical significance between t-tests with C<sub>1</sub> = 40 and CTOT with C<sub>1</sub> = 32.
Published 2022“…The inset Venn diagram illustrates statistically significant differences of levels of circulating microRNAs between control and treated groups, applying the CTOT, MC, or CO method and a maximum quality cycle threshold of C<sub>1</sub> = 32 to the data reported by Silva et al. …”