Search alternatives:
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction decrease » intervention decreases (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search), interaction dataset (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant interaction » significant reduction (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search)
interaction decrease » intervention decreases (Expand Search), interaction terms (Expand Search), interaction dataset (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Enrichment analysis of genes from the significant MS module.
Published 2025“…The color of the dots represents the adjusted P-value (P.adj), and the size represents the number of genes. <b>(d)</b> Top 20 important feature genes identified by the random forest model, ranked by the average decrease in Gini index. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of dietary niacin for risk of COPD.
Published 2024Subjects: -
15
Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity.
Published 2024Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
Top 10 significant functional annotations of up-regulated DEGs.
Published 2025“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance according to the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
-
19
Top 10 significant functional annotations of down-regulated DEGs.
Published 2025“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance level based on the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
-
20
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”