Search alternatives:
significant progressive » significant progress (Expand Search), significant protective (Expand Search), significant processes (Expand Search)
progressive decrease » progressive decline (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant progressive » significant progress (Expand Search), significant protective (Expand Search), significant processes (Expand Search)
progressive decrease » progressive decline (Expand Search)
risks decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
2
-
3
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Conclusions: A progressive decrease in LVEDD in normal-sized hearts was independently associated with adverse outcomes, highlighting the prognostic importance of declining LV size.…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity.
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
Pore size distribution by MIP.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
14
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Pie charts showing the different patterns of risk factors associated with total colony losses.
Published 2025Subjects: -
19
Pore size distribution of coal samples.
Published 2025“…It shows that the role of peak cluster landform conditions on coal pore structure is significant, and the extent of the role decreases with the increase of vertical principal stresses. …”
-
20