Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
showed increases » showed increased (Expand Search), shape increases (Expand Search), showing increased (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
showed increases » showed increased (Expand Search), shape increases (Expand Search), showing increased (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
20101
-
20102
-
20103
NPF-NPFR pathway in LNd-LPN feedback circuit fine-tune cooling induced locomotion increase.
Published 2024“…(C, D) Optogenetic activation of LNds using CsChrimson (<i>DvPdf-Gal4>Uas-CsChrimson</i>, red line) decreases sleep and this decrease effect was enhanced by NPF RNAi (<i>DvPdf-Gal4>Uas-CsChrimson; Uas-NPF RNAi</i>; green line). …”
-
20104
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20105
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20106
Rank of mutation fitness.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …”
-
20107
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20108
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20109
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20110
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20111
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20112
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20113
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
20114
[A] Immunofluorescence double-labeling images illustrate insulin-immunoreactive cells (green) and glucagon-positive cells (red) in the islets of the control (C), untreated diabetic...
Published 2025“…Notably, insulin- and glucagon-positive cell counts significantly increased after C. lancifolius and crocin treatment. …”
-
20115
-
20116
-
20117
Principal component analysis of soil parameters.
Published 2025“…P, TN, CEC, OM, extractable micronutrients like Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn decreased with increasing soil depth, while the clay content, BD, pH, and exchangeable bases like Ca, Mg, Na, and K were increased with increasing soil depth. …”
-
20118
-
20119
Key modeling details for CoVPF and controls.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …”
-
20120
LSTM model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”