Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
2641
-
2642
-
2643
Demographics of the study population.
Published 2024“…However, there was no significant difference in OBH between the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>p</i> > 0.05). …”
-
2644
Table 3 -
Published 2024“…However, there was no significant difference in OBH between the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>p</i> > 0.05). …”
-
2645
-
2646
-
2647
-
2648
-
2649
-
2650
-
2651
-
2652
-
2653
-
2654
-
2655
-
2656
-
2657
-
2658
Different ellipsoidal particles with De = 6.30 mm used in the discrete element simulations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2659
-
2660
Stress concentration factor value in the numerical samples with different shapes and sizes.
Published 2025Subjects: