Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
941
-
942
-
943
-
944
-
945
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
946
-
947
-
948
-
949
Effects of increasing gravel on initial escape latency in non-injured <i>vs.</i>
Published 2025“…</b> However latency was significantly decrease for the 40 g condition in the injured day 0 animals. **** indicates significant differences across increasing amounts of gravel (p < 0.0001). * indicates a post-hoc test confirming a significant difference between injured and non-injured animals 40 g (p < 0.05).…”
-
950
SAR distribution in the cerebrum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
951
-
952
-
953
-
954
-
955
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
956
-
957
-
958
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
959
-
960
Simulated and measured S-parameters comparison of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna.
Published 2025Subjects: