SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg). by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Fabrication of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Performance comparison of miniaturized mobile terminal MIMO antenna. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg). by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Human head modeling. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Simulated and measured S-parameters comparison of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Variations in SAR for individual organizations. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Geometry and structure of the MIMO mobile terminal antenna. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg). by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Radiation patterns at1.9 GHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 3.5 GHz. by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg). by Wen-Ying Zhou (10049543)

Subjects:

Effects of injury on operant conditioning and memory. by Ella R. Dockendorf (21533334)

Retention and extinction of operant learning. by Ella R. Dockendorf (21533334)

Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance. by Huriye Senay Kiziltan (22298378)

Subjects:

Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth. by Hala Tamim El Jarkass (16625309)

Subjects:

Significant Wilcoxon test results of the Task 1 Nasa TLX data, differences between feedback ON and OFF. by Mucahit Gemici (21519313)

Effects of increasing amounts of gravel on escape latency and aversiveness of gravel. by Ella R. Dockendorf (21533334)

“…Over five trials, latency significantly decreased in the 20 and 40 g groups. *p < 0.05 refers to effect of trial and ****p < 0.0001 refers to effect of group. …”

Effect of injury on negative phototaxis. by Ella R. Dockendorf (21533334)

Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”

Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”