Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
681
-
682
-
683
-
684
-
685
The error between test and simulation results.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
686
Relevant parameters of cutting head and pick.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
687
The stress variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
688
Deformation trend of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
689
Force transformation of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
690
3D model of cutting head.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
691
Rigid-flexible coupling mode.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
692
The flow of cutting performance calculation.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
693
Results of different optimization schemes.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
694
Modal shape of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
695
Deformation variation of Node 33.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
696
Optimization parameters of gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
697
Property parameters of rock samples.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
698
Modal frequency of the gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
699
Optimized design nodes of different parameters.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”
-
700
Fatigue life distribution of gyration platform.
Published 2024“…Deformation was predominantly observed on both sides of the lifting cylinder and the rear portion of the gyration platform. …”