Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Voxel-based whole-brain analysis shows regional and dose-dependent effects of netoglitazone in decreasing plaque mean size.
Published 2025“…However, there is only a minimal effect on decreasing plaque size. (C) Short-term-treatment with a high dose of netoglitazone reveals a significant reduction in plaque size, especially observed in the hippocampus, striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, midbrain, and hindbrain. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…The percentage of activation in the left PLL maximum peak right-hand layup is higher in the non CAI group with a large effect size in single measurements. In relation to motor control, a higher overall signal dispersion is observed in CAI group there is evidence of worse motor control.…”
-
6
Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…The percentage of activation in the left PLL maximum peak right-hand layup is higher in the non CAI group with a large effect size in single measurements. In relation to motor control, a higher overall signal dispersion is observed in CAI group there is evidence of worse motor control.…”
-
7
-
8
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Particle size distribution of GO-GA NPs.
Published 2025“…The inclusion of GO-GA NPs at LC<sub>40</sub> had a significant post-effect on progeny production of <i><i>C. maculatus</i></i>, resulting in a significant reduction in the number of deposited eggs and adult emergence, which led to a significant decrease in the percentage of adult emergence to 15.23 ± 5.46 compared to 61.33 ± 2.94, as observed in the GO treatment. …”
-
15
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">The data are related to the scientific paper “Sibaja Leyton M. et al., (under review) Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas”.</p><p dir="ltr">Data are available as a csv file titled:</p><p dir="ltr">"Sibaja_Leyton_et_al_Dataset_Stingless_Bee_Colony_Losses_in_Latin_America.csv".…”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20