Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Frequency distribution of SOLEC at baseline and follow-ups in WAD grade 2 and WAD grade 3.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
-
7
Baseline descriptive characteristics of trial participants (n = 140) with and without dizziness.
Published 2024Subjects: -
8
Frequency distribution of SOLEC at baseline and follow-ups in the NSEIT and NSE groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
9
-
10
Baseline descriptive characteristics of trial participants with dizziness, by treatment group.
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
17
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
18
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
Assessing Bivalves as Biomonitors of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Coastal Environments
Published 2025“…Additionally, the bioaccumulation factors of PFAS decrease with increasing organism size and age, suggesting that smaller and younger bivalves have greater bioaccumulation potential and are more susceptible to PFAS contamination. …”
-
20