Most significant muscle activation values. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

Subjects:

Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

Subjects:

Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

Subjects:

Comparative analysis of macronutrient compositions between baseline and end of intervention (*p < 0.05, ^ns Non-significant results). by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

Comparative analysis of caloric intake between baseline and end of intervention (*p < 0.05, ^ns Non-significant results). by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

Cephalometric measurement points. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Schematic diagram of experimental injector size. by Lei Bai (631944)

Subjects:

Comparison of the Non-healed but Improved DUs Based on Initial Wound Area Size in 2022 vs. 2023. by Heba Tallah Mohammed (2822432)

Comparison of the Non-healed but Improved PIs Based on Initial Wound Area Size in 2022 vs. 2023. by Heba Tallah Mohammed (2822432)

Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”

Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”

Each subfigure shows a different local size (LS) and context size (CS) configuration, where the reliability of the model across different initializations is measured in R-squared. by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

Subjects:

Paroxysmal tachycardia-related age-adjusted mortality rates per 100,000 in adults in the metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas in the United States, 1999 to 2020. by Aman Goyal (19231397)

Subjects:

Spatial exploration patterns of non-tumor bearing mice under different treatment conditions in the Morris Water Maze (MWM). by Robert Botelho (20308297)

Stability differences between condition 1 and other conditions across participants on the non-hemiparetic side (NHP) side. by Hyung Suk Yang (20442438)

Subjects:

Linear mixed model results, fixed effects for time points, group, time points x group and univariate effects in the two groups WAD grades 2 and 3. by Anneli Peolsson (7867601)

Subjects:

Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population). by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Contrasting Size Dependence of Photochemical Lifetimes of Polypropylene and Expanded Polystyrene Microplastics in Surface Waters by Ariana Patterson (22764051)

Subjects:

Particle size distribution table of sand samples. by Kui Suo (20614613)

Subjects:

IRE1 depletion decreases heterochromatin, DNA and H3K9me3 methylation, and UHRF1. by Iratxe Zuazo-Gaztelu (21071939)