Search alternatives:
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
adverse increased » coverage increased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search), degree increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
adverse increased » coverage increased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search), degree increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Significant spatial clusters of open defecation practice among households in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.
Published 2022Subjects: -
6
The spatial distribution of ozone concentration in China’s provinces in 2015 and 2019.
Published 2024Subjects: -
7
-
8
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in parity subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
9
-
10
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational age subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
11
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
12
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in maternal race subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
13
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in gestational hypertension subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
14
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in preconception BMI subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
15
-
16
Relationship between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in different preconception BMI groups.
Published 2023Subjects: -
17
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in paternal age at delivery subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
18
Association between GWG and adverse neonatal outcomes in maternal age at delivery subpopulations.
Published 2023Subjects: -
19
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
20
500m scale main data of each grid.
Published 2023“…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”