Showing 21 - 40 results of 24,015 for search '(( significant ((spatial decrease) OR (small decrease)) ) OR ( significant cases increased ))', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27

    500m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  8. 28

    1000m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  9. 29

    2000m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35

    DSP: Digital Spatial Profiling. by Jinho Lee (587173)

    Published 2025
    “…Ki-67, CDK6, and CD45 levels decreased in the LTT group, while INPP4B and BCL6 increased. …”
  16. 36
  17. 37

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  18. 38
  19. 39
  20. 40