Search alternatives:
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
difference age » different age (Expand Search), difference pre (Expand Search), difference az (Expand Search)
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
difference age » different age (Expand Search), difference pre (Expand Search), difference az (Expand Search)
-
41
Results from ANOVA testing for significant differences in mean size-at-age.
Published 2022“…<p>Results from ANOVA testing for significant differences in mean size-at-age.</p>…”
-
42
Respondents’ age (n = 448). No significant difference between the subgroups was identified (p > 0.05).
Published 2025“…<p>Respondents’ age (n = 448). No significant difference between the subgroups was identified (p > 0.05).…”
-
43
The strength of the commute time-functional connectivity relationship demonstrates weak pathological significance and weak dependency on age.
Published 2025“…<p>fMRI and dMRI data are processed according to the Desikan-Killiany atlas throughout (84 brain regions). <b>A.</b> Small differences are seen between individuals with mental and nerve disorders compared to healthy individuals in the UK Biobank. …”
-
44
-
45
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…<p>(A) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.134 ± 0.050, APP/PS1 = 0.132 ± 0.054, p < 0.01, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
46
-
47
-
48
Spatial patterns of developmental changes in nodal entropy for different thresholding strategies.
Published 2024“…All correlations were assessed using Pearson’s correlation across nodal regions. The significance of spatial similarity was assessed by comparing the observed value to a null distribution generated through 10,000 permutations that retained the spatial autocorrelation characteristics of the original age effect map (<i>t</i>-value map) in the main results.…”
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
Significant differences in alpha diversity and richness analysis between the three age groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
54
-
55
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
56
-
57
Trips relative to baseline by age group and distance category in (left to right) Atlanta, Philadelphia and Los Angeles.
Published 2023“…From late March onwards relative travel is slightly higher in the younger age groups but these differences are still small. …”
-
58
-
59
-
60