Search alternatives:
differences tests » difference tests (Expand Search), difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
differences tests » difference tests (Expand Search), difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
Results from ANOVA testing for significant differences in mean size-at-age.
Published 2022“…<p>Results from ANOVA testing for significant differences in mean size-at-age.…”
-
42
The results of T-test for the significance testing of the differences between the considered criteria in solving large-sized problems.
Published 2022“…<p>The results of T-test for the significance testing of the differences between the considered criteria in solving large-sized problems.…”
-
43
Analysis of differences between bee groups by using Dunn’s test (significant species for only significant viruses).
Published 2020“…<p>Analysis of differences between bee groups by using Dunn’s test (significant species for only significant viruses).…”
-
44
-
45
500m scale main data of each grid.
Published 2023“…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
-
46
1000m scale main data of each grid.
Published 2023“…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
-
47
2000m scale main data of each grid.
Published 2023“…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
-
48
-
49
Student’s t-test for significance of differences between uninvaded and invaded plots at different sites.
Published 2021“…<p>Student’s t-test for significance of differences between uninvaded and invaded plots at different sites.…”
-
50
-
51
LSD method significance test.
Published 2024“…Using the 2012–2020 CFPS data to measure and test the opportunity advantages and their differences across regions and groups in China. …”
-
52
-
53
-
54
Raster diagrams illustrating significant FRP differences obtained with cluster-based permutation tests.
Published 2019“…<p>Red and blue rectangles indicate the channel/time point in which the first condition was significantly more positive or negative than the second condition, respectively, in cluster 1. …”
-
55
Comparison of different parameter combinations of significant duration (test set).
Published 2024“…<p>Comparison of different parameter combinations of significant duration (test set).…”
-
56
Significance test of moderated mediation effects at different moderator values.
Published 2022“…<p>Significance test of moderated mediation effects at different moderator values.…”
-
57
-
58
-
59
Model test results.
Published 2024“…It is found that: (1) the scale and vitality of China’s digital technology innovation have increased significantly, and there are obvious spatial differentiation characteristics, and the innovation level of "eastern coastal—central and western interior" is decreasing, forming a cluster distribution pattern in the Yangtze River Delta region, Beijing, Guangdong, and other places, and the degree of agglomeration is decreasing. (2) The overall regional differences in China’s digital technology innovation are large, the differences between the East and the West dominate the interregional differences, and the net differences between regions are the main factors leading to regional differences. (3) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation, which has a significant spatial spillover effect. (4) The results confirm that the level of economic development, digital access, financial scientific and technological support, technology market development level, and R&D intensity have a significant positive impact on the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation; The investment in scientific and technological talents has a significant positive impact on the scale of digital technology innovation, but has no significant impact on the vitality of digital technology innovation.…”
-
60