Search alternatives:
differences tests » difference tests (Expand Search), difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
differences tests » difference tests (Expand Search), difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
Change in average COD concentration peak value and arrival time at different cross-sections.
Published 2021Subjects: -
63
-
64
Model test results.
Published 2025“…In the stage of high-quality development (2012 present), the contribution rate of technological factors continued to rise and become the dominant factor, while the contribution rate of land factors has decreased to a lower level. (2) Regarding spatial characteristics, the spatial econometric model reveals significant spatial agglomeration characteristics of capital and labor, and land factors positively affect local and neighboring economic growth. …”
-
65
GTDE decreased the expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome and AGEs in the cerebral cortex.
Published 2022Subjects: -
66
Significant differences for size by sex in the altitudinal gradient, according to the Pairwise Mann–Whitney U-tests.
Published 2020“…<p>Significant differences for size by sex in the altitudinal gradient, according to the Pairwise Mann–Whitney U-tests.…”
-
67
Test model identification.
Published 2024“…This study examines the impact of reopening countries to receive foreign tourists on the spread of COVID-19 in 2022, encompassing 83 countries worldwide. We employ spatial quantile models capable of analyzing the spatial impact of tourism on the spread of the virus at different quantile levels. …”
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
Number of significant indices in post-hoc analysis using different adjustment methods.
Published 2024Subjects: -
72
-
73
Significantly different regions across six focus conditions and the baseline for Japanese monosyllabic targets based on functional t-tests (Marginally significant differences are marked in parentheses).
Published 2023“…<p>Significantly different regions across six focus conditions and the baseline for Japanese monosyllabic targets based on functional t-tests (Marginally significant differences are marked in parentheses).…”
-
74
-
75
-
76
Display of significance test results.
Published 2025“…Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that, across multiple datasets constructed from fabrics with different elasticity grades, the model shows extremely significant differences (p < 0.001) in the metrics of Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) at each prediction step. …”
-
77
Cross validation—‘<’ indicates that the solutions significantly differ (at the 5% level) according to the Wilcoxon test.
Published 2020“…<p>Cross validation—‘<’ indicates that the solutions significantly differ (at the 5% level) according to the Wilcoxon test.…”
-
78
Post-hoc tests using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) for wildlife attributes.
Published 2025“…<p>Post-hoc tests using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) for wildlife attributes.…”
-
79
Sleep Quality Association with likelihood of nondipping (Mean and IQR) and tests of statistical significance in difference.
Published 2023“…<p>Sleep Quality Association with likelihood of nondipping (Mean and IQR) and tests of statistical significance in difference.</p>…”
-
80
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”