Search alternatives:
significant different » significantly different (Expand Search), significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
different data » different age (Expand Search), different datasets (Expand Search)
significant different » significantly different (Expand Search), significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
different data » different age (Expand Search), different datasets (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
25
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
26
-
27
Bexarotene pretreatment significantly suppressed HBV and HDV infections in primary human hepatocytes (PHH).
Published 2022“…The data were pooled to assess the statistical significance. …”
-
28
-
29
Boruta, random forest model variable significance and ranking for biological sound producers.
Published 2023“…All the factors were significant at p < 0.01. Post hoc differences can be seen in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0283848#pone.0283848.t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>.…”
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40