Showing 1 - 20 results of 10,293 for search '(( significant ((spatial decrease) OR (small decrease)) ) OR ( significant sources decrease ))', query time: 0.74s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    500m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  3. 3

    1000m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  4. 4

    2000m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Data sources and descriptions. by Qianhong Mao (22305184)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show ES interactions exhibit significant spatial variability under the evolution of metropolitan spatial structure, thus innovatively proposing integration of ESs synergies into urban-fringe-rural development framework to support overall landscape sustainability.…”
  19. 19
  20. 20