Showing 1 - 20 results of 11,108 for search '(( significant ((spatial decrease) OR (small decrease)) ) OR ( significant threats increased ))', query time: 0.75s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Threat factors and their associated attributes. by Shaolei Guo (3146259)

    Published 2024
    “…The results indicate that: (1) During the study period, the overall land use type in Hebi City has been constantly changing, with the most significant conversion from arable land to other land types; combined with its landscape pattern index, Hebi City has a general characteristic of significant landscape fragmentation and complexity in land use. (2) Habitat quality in Hebi shows an overall trend towards better development, with water availability decreasing and then increasing; the zoning of ecosystem services in Hebi is divided into three classes: superior, good and general, with the area covered by the superior and general classes expanding year by year. (3) Correlation analysis by SPSS software shows that the correlation between habitat quality and landscape pattern index is greater than the correlation between habitat quality and climate change. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
  8. 8

    500m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  9. 9

    1000m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  10. 10

    2000m scale main data of each grid. by Qingxi Shen (3547970)

    Published 2023
    “…Finally, in the context of scale differences, all types of coupling coordination degrees have significant sensitivity to the spatial scales. A large scale significantly reflects the overall decrease in the coupling coordination degrees from the core to the periphery, while a small scale shows the polycentric pattern characteristics of the urban spatial structure.…”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Table_2_Postural threat increases sample entropy of postural control.docx by Olivia M. Fischer (16021841)

    Published 2023
    “…Males and females responded in the same way when threatened, except males had significantly larger threat-induced increases in attention to balance and high-frequency sway. …”
  17. 17

    Table_1_Postural threat increases sample entropy of postural control.docx by Olivia M. Fischer (16021841)

    Published 2023
    “…Males and females responded in the same way when threatened, except males had significantly larger threat-induced increases in attention to balance and high-frequency sway. …”
  18. 18

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  19. 19
  20. 20