Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
-
1861
-
1862
-
1863
-
1864
-
1865
Relative abundance of microbiota in colonic content at the genus level (n = 5).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1866
-
1867
Potential metabolites in the colonic tissue related with diarrhea induced by FSE.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1868
Heatmap and pathway analysis of the potential metabolites in colon tissue related with diarrhea.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1869
-
1870
-
1871
Serum metabolomic response to aging.
Published 2024“…<b>(B)</b> Metabolites that decreased with aging. Statistical significance is indicated in the heatmap with asterisks. …”
-
1872
-
1873
The framework of this study.
Published 2025“…The results show that (1) the landscape pattern changed visibly from 2000 to 2020, the comprehensive land-use dynamics increased from 8.53% to 9.66%, and the land use dynamics are greatest and change most dramatically on construction sites; (2) the landscape ecological risk level of the study area as a whole showed a declining trend, and 96.82% of the ecological risk plot index decreased, and the risk distribution was dominated by lower risk, medium risk and higher risk areas; (3) landscape ecological risk was spatially positively correlated across all time periods, and the spatial aggregation was gradually weakened, with the distribution of LH and HL areas dispersed and the distribution of HH and LL areas concentrated. …”
-
1874
Ecological risk level and area from 2000 to 2020.
Published 2025“…The results show that (1) the landscape pattern changed visibly from 2000 to 2020, the comprehensive land-use dynamics increased from 8.53% to 9.66%, and the land use dynamics are greatest and change most dramatically on construction sites; (2) the landscape ecological risk level of the study area as a whole showed a declining trend, and 96.82% of the ecological risk plot index decreased, and the risk distribution was dominated by lower risk, medium risk and higher risk areas; (3) landscape ecological risk was spatially positively correlated across all time periods, and the spatial aggregation was gradually weakened, with the distribution of LH and HL areas dispersed and the distribution of HH and LL areas concentrated. …”
-
1875
Area of land use types from 2000 to 2020.
Published 2025“…The results show that (1) the landscape pattern changed visibly from 2000 to 2020, the comprehensive land-use dynamics increased from 8.53% to 9.66%, and the land use dynamics are greatest and change most dramatically on construction sites; (2) the landscape ecological risk level of the study area as a whole showed a declining trend, and 96.82% of the ecological risk plot index decreased, and the risk distribution was dominated by lower risk, medium risk and higher risk areas; (3) landscape ecological risk was spatially positively correlated across all time periods, and the spatial aggregation was gradually weakened, with the distribution of LH and HL areas dispersed and the distribution of HH and LL areas concentrated. …”
-
1876
-
1877
-
1878
Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1879
-
1880