Search alternatives:
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
Forskolin increases the presynaptic surface area of glutamate release and the spatial synchronization of glutamate release within hMFBs.
Published 2021“…Bar graphs indicating the significant increase in cumulative amplitude in the presence of forskolin (maximal response to the first stimulation) (G), the decrease in the cumulative PPR (H), and the unchanged tau of decay of the cumulative intensities (I). …”
-
5
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
The evaluation of spatial learning and memory by Morris water maze test.
Published 2024“…The escape latency time during the three blocks in the 2VO + LUT-0.5 and 2VO + LUT-5 groups significantly decreased compared to the 2VO + V group (A). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”