Search alternatives:
substantial decrease » substantial increase (Expand Search), substantially increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
substantial decrease » substantial increase (Expand Search), substantially increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant fold » significant force (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
-
1
Number of significantly significant (P < 0.05) differentially abundant (SSDA) proteins showing increased or decreased activity (fold change +/- 1.5-fold) relative to time 0 following storage at 9°C or 20°C of infective juveniles of <i>S</i>....
Published 2022“…<p>Number of significantly significant (P < 0.05) differentially abundant (SSDA) proteins showing increased or decreased activity (fold change +/- 1.5-fold) relative to time 0 following storage at 9°C or 20°C of infective juveniles of <i>S</i>. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Identification of ACADM, ANGPTL4, and NFKB2 as significant predictors of OS in the TCGA-KIRC cohort.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
Photoreceptors undergo substantial changes in TF activity during aging.
Published 2022“…<p>A. Heatmap of RNA-seq fold change during aging for significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs; p-adj<0.05, |FC|>1.5 relative to D10) associated with the GO term “RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor binding” (GO:0061629). …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
Spatial characteristics of cultivated land expansion in China during 2000~2020.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20