Showing 61 - 80 results of 94,652 for search '(( significant ((step decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( significant interaction increases ))', query time: 2.43s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62
  3. 63
  4. 64
  5. 65
  6. 66

    Algorithm operation steps. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

    Published 2025
    “…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
  7. 67
  8. 68

    Significant Lipids by Category- Tiers 1 and 2. by Keenan Elliott (17181211)

    Published 2023
    “…Each lipid category is divided by timepoint, with 18 hpbm shown in green, 24 hpbm shown in purple, and 36 hpbm shown in orange. The number of significant lipids differently regulated is shown on the Y-axis, with positive values indicating an increase in concentration compared with Cali-S+DENV controls, and negative values indicating a decrease in concentration. …”
  9. 69
  10. 70
  11. 71
  12. 72
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77
  18. 78

    Significant lipids by category-Tiers 1, 2, and 3. by Keenan Elliott (17181211)

    Published 2023
    “…Each lipid category is divided by timepoint, with 18 hpbm shown in green, 24 hpbm shown in purple, and 36 hpbm shown in orange. The number of significant lipids differently regulated is shown on the Y-axis, with positive values indicating an increase in concentration compared with Cali-S+DENV samples, and negative values indicating a decrease in concentration. …”
  19. 79
  20. 80

    The interaction effect of O<sub>3</sub> with age. by John Brandt (6880463)

    Published 2024
    “…We combine high frequency data on ozone and fine particulate pollution with daily consumer spending in brick-and-mortar retail in 129 postal codes in Spain during 2014 to estimate the association between the two. Using a linear fixed effects model, we find that a 1-standard deviation increase in ozone concentration (20.97 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) is associated with 3.9 percent decrease in consumer spending (95% CI: -0.066, -0.012; p<0.01). …”