Search alternatives:
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
difference tests » difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search), reference test (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
difference tests » difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search), reference test (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Gradation determined by the step-by-step filling test on the coarse aggregates.
Published 2022Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Plasma metabolites that significantly differ between HFD-fed and chow-fed minipigs.
Published 2024“…<p>Significant features have a greater than two-fold difference between the study groups and an FDR-adjusted p < 0.05, calculated by a Student’s t-test.…”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Results of the compaction tests on ER-OCSM specimens with different emulsified asphalt contents.
Published 2022Subjects: -
16
Significance test of the difference between the results of important characteristics.
Published 2023“…<p>Significance test of the difference between the results of important characteristics.…”
-
17
Plasma metabolites that significantly differ between female HFD-fed and chow-fed minipigs.
Published 2024“…<p>Significant features have a greater than two-fold difference between the study groups and an FDR-adjusted p < 0.05, calculated by a Student’s t-test.…”
-
18
Plasma metabolites that significantly differ between male HFD-fed and chow-fed minipigs.
Published 2024“…<p>Significant features have a greater than two-fold difference between the study groups and an FDR-adjusted p < 0.05, calculated by a Student’s t-test.…”
-
19
-
20