Search alternatives:
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
clusters increase » causes increased (Expand Search), confers increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
clusters increase » causes increased (Expand Search), confers increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
Gradation determined by the step-by-step filling test on the coarse aggregates.
Published 2022Subjects: -
67
-
68
-
69
Drp1<sup>SD</sup> overexpression in Opa1 or Marf depleted type II NBs rescues the reduced mitochondrial membrane potential.
Published 2022“…Analysis of cytochrome C intensity normalized with control (D). +/+ (19 NBs, 8 brains), <i>opa1</i> RNAi (22 NBs, 7 brains), <i>marf</i> RNAi (23 NBs, 7 brains). B,D: Graphs show mean ± sd. Comparative analysis was done by using unpaired t-test. ns- non significant, **- p<0.01, ***- p<0.001.…”
-
70
-
71
-
72
Hierarchal clustering of the HDV and HBV datasets identified distinct temporal clusters.
Published 2023Subjects: -
73
-
74
Increasing the number of (T)GCATG motifs in clusters does not increase the gene isoform expression change.
Published 2025“…Note the dramatic inverse correlation in the number of genes with eCLIP peaks as clusters have increased (T)GCATG motifs number. ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p-value≤ 0.00001; ns, non-significant.…”
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80