Search alternatives:
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
difference tests » difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search), reference test (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant difference » significant differences (Expand Search)
difference tests » difference test (Expand Search), different tests (Expand Search), reference test (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
Fisher’s exact test showed significant differences among the three groups.
Published 2023“…<p>Fisher’s exact test showed significant differences among the three groups.…”
-
127
Demographic distributions of the patients and significant differences between the training and test datasets.
Published 2022“…<p>Demographic distributions of the patients and significant differences between the training and test datasets.…”
-
128
T-test results(Values in bold indicate significant differences at 90% confidence).
Published 2025“…<p>T-test results(Values in bold indicate significant differences at 90% confidence).…”
-
129
Results from ANOVA testing for significant differences in mean size-at-age.
Published 2022“…<p>Results from ANOVA testing for significant differences in mean size-at-age.…”
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
Test for the significance of the difference between top two Spearman correlation scores for each cartridge sample.
Published 2023“…<p>Test for the significance of the difference between top two Spearman correlation scores for each cartridge sample.…”
-
137
-
138
Significantly different regions across six focus conditions and the baseline for Japanese monosyllabic targets based on functional t-tests (Marginally significant differences are marked in parentheses).
Published 2023“…<p>Significantly different regions across six focus conditions and the baseline for Japanese monosyllabic targets based on functional t-tests (Marginally significant differences are marked in parentheses).…”
-
139
-
140