Search alternatives:
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
Networks of affect states: Significant paths.
Published 2021“…<p>In this figure, affect states networks are visualized for the Stable and the Increase groups. Only significant paths (p<0.05) are presented. Presented are temporal networks, meaning that the connections represent the effect of the variable at time point t-1 on the variable at the time point t. …”
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
Human cochlin bound to <i>N</i>-sulfated heparin and mutations in DFNA9 patients decreased binding affinity.
Published 2022“…(B) <i>N</i>-desulfated, <i>N</i>-acetylated heparin significantly decreased binding affinity for cochlin. …”
-
149
-
150
SURF6 knockdown affects cell cycle distribution of HCT116 human intestinal carcinoma cells.
Published 2023Subjects: -
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
Taxonomic changes grouped by phylum and direction of change in relative abundance that were significantly different in either time point comparison by PERMANOVA analysis.
Published 2022“…Log2 fold change (Log2FC) between mean relative abundances at each time point are colored in orange for increasing fold change, and blue for decreasing fold change. …”
-
157
Comparison of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in the hippocampus between the CCH and control groups.
Published 2022Subjects: -
158
-
159
-
160
Data processing and analysis steps.
Published 2023“…<i>haematobium</i> prevalence decreased from 23.8% to 3.6% and that of hookworm from 8.6% to 3.1% between 2008 and 2015. …”