Search alternatives:
significant predictive » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant protective (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
value » values (Expand Search)
significant predictive » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant protective (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
value » values (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
Significance Values of Multi-Group Analyses.
Published 2025“…Academic exhaustion was the stronger predictor (β = 0.523, p < .001), followed by social connecteness to the campus (β = −31, p < .001), vocational difficulties (β = 0.274, p < .001), and course value (β = −0.256, p < .001). Except for the course value, and family educational level, all significant predictors had their effect on dropout intention through academic exhaustion. …”
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
Predicted value of S1 station.
Published 2025“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”
-
129
Predicted value of S3 station.
Published 2025“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”
-
130
Predicted value of S2 station.
Published 2025“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–South Africa.
Published 2023Subjects: -
135
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–United Kingdom.
Published 2023Subjects: -
136
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–United Kingdom.
Published 2023Subjects: -
137
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–South Africa.
Published 2023Subjects: -
138
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–United States.
Published 2023Subjects: -
139
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–United States.
Published 2023Subjects: -
140