Search alternatives:
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
clusters increase » causes increased (Expand Search), confers increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant clusters » significant cause (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant factors (Expand Search)
clusters increase » causes increased (Expand Search), confers increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
Overview of the WeARTolerance program.
Published 2024“…<div><p>The stigma surrounding mental health remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and well-being in youth populations. …”
-
43
Hierarchal clustering of the HDV and HBV datasets identified distinct temporal clusters.
Published 2023Subjects: -
44
-
45
-
46
Increasing the number of (T)GCATG motifs in clusters does not increase the gene isoform expression change.
Published 2025“…Note the dramatic inverse correlation in the number of genes with eCLIP peaks as clusters have increased (T)GCATG motifs number. ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p-value≤ 0.00001; ns, non-significant.…”
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
Statistical criteria for the number of clusters.
Published 2024“…To identify hemoglobin trajectories over eight years (2002–2009), we performed a three-step approach comprising measures of change, factor analysis, and cluster analysis. …”
-
56
Clusters that showed significantly increased PPI connectivity for the contrast of [emotion matching > gender matching] during the Facial Affect Matching task at 12 wks compared to baseline.
Published 2019“…<p>Clusters that showed significantly increased PPI connectivity for the contrast of [emotion matching > gender matching] during the Facial Affect Matching task at 12 wks compared to baseline.…”
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60