Showing 361 - 380 results of 13,120 for search '(( significant ((teer decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( significant increase decrease ))', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 361
  2. 362
  3. 363
  4. 364
  5. 365
  6. 366

    Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  7. 367
  8. 368
  9. 369
  10. 370
  11. 371
  12. 372

    Cross-sectional dependence results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
  13. 373

    Autocorrelation test results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
  14. 374

    Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
  15. 375

    Descriptive statistics of related variables. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
  16. 376
  17. 377

    The percentage of studies that resulted in insect death increased over time. by Craig D. Perl (3326880)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>There was a significant increase in the proportion of studies containing insect death (with or without handling) over time (linear regression; t<sub>20,18</sub> = 2.33, p = 0.031, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23). …”
  18. 378

    Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  19. 379

    Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked. by Indrani Bera (804948)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
  20. 380