Search alternatives:
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant spatial » significant potential (Expand Search), significant negative (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), substantial decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
Significant spatial clusters of open defecation practice among households in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.
Published 2022Subjects: -
107
TBSS results showing significant AxD and RD changes at baseline and the follow-up.
Published 2025“…The decreased diffusivity metrics (AxD and RD) exhibited no statistically significant differences at <i><i>P</i></i> < 0.05 after correcting for multiple comparisons (FWE). …”
-
108
Decreased thrombin activity levels in PAR KO following 24 hours following ischemia.
Published 2021“…<p>(A) Total thrombin activity is significantly decreased in PAR1 KO compared to WT mice (t-test). …”
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
The research process for the present study.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
119
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
120
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”