Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Statins induced flatter neuronal somas. by Shuk C. Tsoi (21192243)

Top 10 significant functional annotations of up-regulated DEGs. by Meitner Cadena (22216261)

“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance according to the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”

Top 10 significant functional annotations of down-regulated DEGs. by Meitner Cadena (22216261)

“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance level based on the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”

Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Burn out assessment throughout demographic structure of the participant. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Relationships between cohesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Demographic structure and Employment categorization. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Stack column chart represent Emotional Exhaustion through demographic structure. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Hardness increase across different IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Relationships between adhesiveness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Cohesiveness changes across IDDSI levels and food categories. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects:

Donut chart shows Demographic structure and Employment categorization. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

i & ii: PCA represent the (i) 2d and (ii) 3d to identify the underlying dimensions of the lifestyle questions. by Nehal Mohamed Eisa (21148787)

Subjects:

Multiple linear regression analysis results. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

Subjects: