Showing 2,001 - 2,020 results of 15,004 for search '(( significant ((time decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ) OR ( significant increase decrease ))', query time: 0.62s Refine Results
  1. 2001
  2. 2002

    AC-LPN circuit control high temperature induced increase of evening sleep. by Xin Yuan (174619)

    Published 2024
    “…(D–G) Optogenetic activation of ppkACs with CsChrimson (<i>Ppk-LexA>LexAop-CsChrimson</i>) increases LPN activity in vivo (D). Scale bars, 10 mm. …”
  3. 2003
  4. 2004
  5. 2005
  6. 2006
  7. 2007

    Voxel-based whole-hemisphere analysis shows regional and dose-dependent decrease of microglia. by Francesca Catto (21253435)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(A) Each 3-dimensional map of statistically affected voxels (p < 0.05, with the red scale, representing the significance in decrease of microglia, and the cyan scale, representing the increase in microglia; reference atlas is grey) summarizes all the treated and control samples within a cohort (3 samples per group). …”
  8. 2008
  9. 2009
  10. 2010
  11. 2011
  12. 2012
  13. 2013
  14. 2014
  15. 2015

    Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  16. 2016

    Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  17. 2017

    Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  18. 2018

    Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  19. 2019

    Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  20. 2020

    The relative importance by dominance analysis. by Lijuan Zhao (1387689)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Results indicate that negative life experiences have a significant negative impact on sense of security, which first decreases but then increases over time. …”