Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2021
Data cleaning and preparation algorithm.
Published 2025“…Prevalence rates steadily increased from 1.30 to 7.32 per 100,000. The cohort’s mean age was 63.2 ± 0.1 years, with most cases diagnosed as stage III hepatocellular carcinoma. …”
-
2022
-
2023
-
2024
-
2025
-
2026
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2027
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2028
UCS texts data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2029
Effects of increasing gravel on initial escape latency in non-injured <i>vs.</i>
Published 2025“…</b> However latency was significantly decrease for the 40 g condition in the injured day 0 animals. **** indicates significant differences across increasing amounts of gravel (p < 0.0001). * indicates a post-hoc test confirming a significant difference between injured and non-injured animals 40 g (p < 0.05).…”
-
2030
-
2031
-
2032
Variables, the Time Points Collected, and the Number of Nurses Who Responded.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2033
-
2034
Trends of average and best race times for IRONMAN<sup>®</sup> age group triathletes.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2035
-
2036
-
2037
Immunogenicity results of different vaccination schemes at different time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2038
-
2039
-
2040