Search alternatives:
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Consecutive time points of data collection.
Published 2025“…Effect sizes expectedly decreased over time. Physical quality of life remained relatively constant over time and was the only outcome for which social integration on admission was not a significant prognostic factor.…”
-
8
-
9
The strength of the commute time-functional connectivity relationship demonstrates weak pathological significance and weak dependency on age.
Published 2025“…</b> Individuals with mental health disorders have slightly higher average commute times and much lower average FCs. <b>D.</b> Strengthening commute time-FC correlations shown in <b>B</b> seem to be driven by a decrease in average commute time across age. …”
-
10
-
11
Comparison of PCNA expression grades across different groups at various time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
12
-
13
Comparison of mTOR expression grading among different groups at different time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
15
-
16
Comparison of renal tissue pathological damage grades across different groups at all time points.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
18
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
19
-
20