Search alternatives:
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
time decrease » time increased (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
-
10
-
11
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, CRT (μm ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 546.1 ± 117.0 μm preoperatively to 317.1 ± 46.9, 317.8 ± 55.6, 290.8 ± 33.5, 342.9 ± 82.2, 333.0 ± 84.2, and 349.8 ± 76.9 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
12
Time course of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…In contrast, BCVA in the non-recurrence group significantly improved from 0.31 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 0.25 ± 0.25, 0.23 ± 0.26, 0.23 ± 0.28, 0.21 ± 0.27, 0.20 ± 0.30, and 0.16 ± 0.30 over the same time points (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
13
-
14
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
15
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
16
-
17
Key characteristics of non-healed DU wound records at adopted branches in 2022 and 2023.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
Comparison of the Non-healed but Improved DUs Based on Initial Wound Area Size in 2022 vs. 2023.
Published 2025Subjects: -
19
Comparison of the Non-healed but Improved PIs Based on Initial Wound Area Size in 2022 vs. 2023.
Published 2025Subjects: -
20
The influence of training-time noise on classification accuracy and reliability
Published 2025Subjects: