Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
units increased » unit increase (Expand Search), costs increased (Expand Search), soils increased (Expand Search)
units decrease » unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
units increased » unit increase (Expand Search), costs increased (Expand Search), soils increased (Expand Search)
units decrease » unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
-
941
NeuN expression and neuronal apoptosis in Sham and severely injured groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
942
-
943
-
944
-
945
-
946
Pan-cancer analyses of ANGPTL4 expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
Published 2025Subjects: -
947
Pan-cancer analyses of NFKB2 expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
Published 2025Subjects: -
948
-
949
-
950
-
951
-
952
-
953
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
954
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
955
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
956
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
957
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
958
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
959
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
960
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”