Search alternatives:
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
increase under » increased cancer (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
increase under » increased cancer (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
UCS under different rock size.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”
-
6
Regression parameters under different rock sizes.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”
-
7
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">The data are related to the scientific paper “Sibaja Leyton M. et al., (under review) Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas”.…”
-
8
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…This study investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with longitudinal decreases in LV size in this population. Methods: We analyzed echocardiographic data from 6,232 adults with normal baseline left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), with a mean interval of 4.8 years between baseline and follow-up echocardiograms. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Sediment particle size curve.
Published 2024“…The average relative flow of water-fertilizer-integrated irrigation under muddy-water conditions decreased with the increasing of irrigation frequency, and accelerate the clogging of dripper. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
Data_Sheet_1_Overground Walking Decreases Alpha Activity and Entrains Eye Movements in Humans.pdf
Published 2020“…Alpha activity has been considered a valuable marker of inhibition of sensory processing and shown to negatively correlate with neuronal firing rates. We found that walking led to a decrease in alpha activity over occipital cortex compared to standing. …”
-
16
UCS under different rock bridge angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) the uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of the rock bridge angle, showing a power function relationship; (2) The uniaxial compressive strength decreases with the increase of rock size and tends to stabilize when the rock size is greater than 350 mm, showing a significant size effect. (3) The fluctuation coefficient of compressive strength increases with the increase of rock bridge angle and decreases with the increase of rock size; When the rock size is 350 mm, the fluctuation coefficient is less than 5%; (4) The characteristic compressive strength and characteristic size both increase with the increase of the rock bridge angle.…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
The numerical values underlying Fig 4.
Published 2023“…However, only the KO mice showed a significant decrease in rotarod performance of 1.2 g/kg EtOH. …”
-
20
Individual stability values for different gait events under various conditions.
Published 2024Subjects: