Search alternatives:
substantial decrease » substantial increase (Expand Search), substantially increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
17 based » 1 based (Expand Search), _ based (Expand Search), ai based (Expand Search)
substantial decrease » substantial increase (Expand Search), substantially increased (Expand Search)
spatial decrease » spatial release (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
17 based » 1 based (Expand Search), _ based (Expand Search), ai based (Expand Search)
-
1
Percentage of significant variation trend of NDVI in the nine divisions in Northeast China.
Published 2022Subjects: -
2
Results of NDVI trend analysis and significant test in Northeast China from 2001 to 2020.
Published 2022Subjects: -
3
Significant spatial clusters of open defecation practice among households in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016.
Published 2022Subjects: -
4
Significant condition.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
5
-
6
Results of significance for regression factors.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Spatial characteristics of cultivated land expansion in China during 2000~2020.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
-
18
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(C) In vCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.138 ± 0.065, APP/PS1 = 0.112 ± 0.035, p < 10<sup>−6</sup>, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 689 units from 6 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 651 units from 8 recording sessions). …”
-
19
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
20