Search alternatives:
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
side decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
161
Absorption peaks of groups.
Published 2025“…We measured the performance of these solutions and revealed that the AES + AEO-9 blend demonstrated a significant synergistic effect, markedly enhancing the capture efficiency of water for lignite dust.…”
-
162
Infrared spectrogram of lignite.
Published 2025“…We measured the performance of these solutions and revealed that the AES + AEO-9 blend demonstrated a significant synergistic effect, markedly enhancing the capture efficiency of water for lignite dust.…”
-
163
Prisma flow diagram of study selection.
Published 2025“…Additionally, watching ≥6 hours of television per day was associated with a significant decrease in cognitive score (standardized beta coefficient = −0.09; 95% CI: −0.17, −0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.8%; seven studies). …”
-
164
The Vancouver Scar Scale.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
165
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
166
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
167
Mammary fistula (n(%)).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
168
Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
169
Postoperative drainage(ml) (M(IQR)).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
170
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
171
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
172
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
173
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
174
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
175
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
176
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
177
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
178
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
179
-
180