Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant 2 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
2 increase » _ increase (Expand Search), 7 increase (Expand Search), _ increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant 2 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
2 increase » _ increase (Expand Search), 7 increase (Expand Search), _ increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Significant condition.
Published 2024“…Over time, the content of C-A-H stabilized at 22%, the amount of CH decreased from 19% to 14%, whereas the amount of AFt increased to 15.9% by Day 28. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Trajectory scores decrease during learning.
Published 2024“…Black lines indicate linear fits. We observed significant decreasing trends (*<i>p <</i> 0.05, * * <i>p <</i> 0.001), except for the left target for Monkey T and the downwards target for Monkey K.…”
-
6
Results of significance for regression factors.
Published 2024“…Over time, the content of C-A-H stabilized at 22%, the amount of CH decreased from 19% to 14%, whereas the amount of AFt increased to 15.9% by Day 28. …”
-
7
Supp Tables 1 and 2 from Tropical mammal functional diversity increases with productivity but decreases with anthropogenic disturbance
Published 2021“…We use occupancy values derived from the camera trap data to calculate occupancy-weighted functional diversity and use Bayesian generalized linear regression to determine the effects of multiple predictors. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20