Search alternatives:
significant 7 » significant 17 (Expand Search), significant 47 (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
7 increase » _ increase (Expand Search), 2 increase (Expand Search), _ increased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
significant 7 » significant 17 (Expand Search), significant 47 (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
7 increase » _ increase (Expand Search), 2 increase (Expand Search), _ increased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.
Published 2023“…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age.
Published 2021“…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
-
15
Increased osteoblastic activity and decreased osteoclastogenesis in TgLRAP cells <i>in vitro</i>.
Published 2021“…Compared with the co-culture of WT BMCs and WT calvarial cells (WT / WT), the number of osteoclasts were significantly decreased at 50% in the co-cultures of TgLRAP BMCs and TgLRAP calvarial cells (TgLRAP / TgLRAP) (graph). …”
-
16
T lymphocyte populations significantly increased in APRIL<sup>-/-</sup>/BLyS<sup>-/-</sup> group.
Published 2022Subjects: -
17
-
18
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
19
-
20