Showing 81 - 100 results of 17,851 for search '(( significant a decrease ) OR ( significant ((a decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 0.64s Refine Results
  1. 81
  2. 82

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  3. 83

    Predictive Significance of Glycosyltransferase-Related lncRNAs in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation by Xiaoyu Shen (4715430)

    Published 2025
    “…And the low-risk cohort exhibited increased immune infiltration and decreased tumor purity. Additionally, significant differences in tumor mutation profiles were observed, with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) being higher in the low-risk cohort, suggesting a potentially better response to immunotherapy. …”
  4. 84
  5. 85
  6. 86
  7. 87

    Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is a very common injury in the world of basketball. …”
  8. 88

    Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes. by María Benito-de-Pedro (22057468)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is a very common injury in the world of basketball. …”
  9. 89
  10. 90
  11. 91
  12. 92

    Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index. by Søren Egstrand (10906087)

    Published 2025
    “…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
  13. 93
  14. 94
  15. 95
  16. 96
  17. 97
  18. 98
  19. 99
  20. 100