Search alternatives:
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant a » significant _ (Expand Search), significant i (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Soil partice-size distribution.
Published 2025“…The swelling pressure of reinforced expansive soil exhibits a significant negative correlation with both the UHMWPE content (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and its length. …”
-
14
-
15
Supplementary Material for: Longitudinal Decrease in Left Ventricular Size with Age: Impact on Mortality and Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Published 2025“…Conclusions: A progressive decrease in LVEDD in normal-sized hearts was independently associated with adverse outcomes, highlighting the prognostic importance of declining LV size.…”
-
16
-
17
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.
Published 2025“…Positive effect sizes indicate an increase in metabolite concentration between the compared groups, while negative values indicate a decrease.…”
-
18
-
19
-
20