Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search)
adverse decrease » rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search)
adverse decrease » rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
521
The context for each survey round.
Published 2025“…In conclusion, despite adaptations over time and the decrease in reported disruptions, prolonged economic shock was associated with multiple adverse effects on Nurturing Care. …”
-
522
Survey respondent characteristics by round.
Published 2025“…In conclusion, despite adaptations over time and the decrease in reported disruptions, prolonged economic shock was associated with multiple adverse effects on Nurturing Care. …”
-
523
Key results by category and survey round.
Published 2025“…In conclusion, despite adaptations over time and the decrease in reported disruptions, prolonged economic shock was associated with multiple adverse effects on Nurturing Care. …”
-
524
-
525
Risk of bias across 22 included studie.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”
-
526
An overview of the selection process for studies.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”
-
527
Characteristics of studies (<i>n</i> = 22).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”
-
528
-
529
Included studies basic characteristics.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
530
Forest plot for FVC.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
531
All data extracted.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
532
Forest plot for TNF-
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
533
Bias risk assessment of included studies.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
534
Forest plot for hs-CRP.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
535
Forest plot for IL-6.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
536
The PRISMA study flowchart.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
537
Forest plot for FEV1/FVC.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
538
Forest plot for clinical efficacy.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
539
Forest plot for FEV1.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
540
The excluded and included studies were listed.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”