Search alternatives:
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
Long COVID prevalence decreases with vaccine uptake in the U.S.
Published 2023“…<p>(A) Prevalence in U.S. states and the U.S. exhibits a decreasing trend with respect to vaccine uptake, both in the population vaccinated with at least one dose (top) and two doses (bottom), with the largest gap between 100% vaccinated and 100% unvaccinated scenarios observed in the reference population of adults who had COVID-19. …”
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
Western blotting for OMP expression using olfactory bulb and olfactory epithelium.
Published 2025Subjects: -
34
-
35
-
36
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
37
Baseline demographics and comorbidities by presence of post-treatment adverse cardiovascular events.
Published 2024Subjects: -
38
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.…”
-
39
-
40
Adverse events during clinical trial.
Published 2024“…However, there was no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.070). And analysis of epidermal thickness showed a significant increase in LED (495.62 ± 327.09 μm) compared to Sham (195.36 ± 263.04 μm) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).…”