Search alternatives:
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
10
-
11
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
12
-
13
-
14
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
15
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
Contains all data.
Published 2025“…All three types of energies decreased exponentially with increasing loading rate. …”
-
19
Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
20